Effective Approaches For Innovation Support For Smes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/svid.2000-964X.13232Keywords:
Centres for Design and Innovation, Knowledge Exchange, Experiential Learning, Trialogical LearningAbstract
Providing appropriate innovation support to small to medium sized enterprises (SMEs) is an on-going challenge. Governments offer a range of initiatives from advice, to research and development grants; however, the underlying methodological frameworks for these interventions are often unclear. Universities have an increasing role to play in providing an understanding of the learning frameworks that surround innovation support and by providing design-led interventions that follow a design thinking approach. This paper considers the ways in which innovation knowledge can be transferred to SMEs based on a constructivist model of knowledge development. The development of Communities of Practice that support innovation making use of IT systems is also explored. Observations are made on the most effective ways of providing support for SMEs applying an experiential learning model, based on the authors’ experience of directing and working within the Centre for Design & Innovation (c4di) at the Robert Gordon University Aberdeen
Downloads
References
Beckman, S., & Barry M. (2007) Innovation as a Learning Process: Embedding Design Thinking, California Management Review, 50(1), 25–56
Brazier, S. (2004) Walking Backward into Design: Support for the SME, Design Management Review, vol 15, Issue 4, pp 61–70, Design Management Institute
Bruner, J. (1960) The Process of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Buchanan, R., (1992) Wicked Problems in Design Thinking” Design Issues, Vol. 8, No. 2, Spring
Dixon P. (2005) Wake Up To Stronger Tribes and Longer Life, Financial Times, October 31st, http://www.globalchange.com/financialtimesdixonfeature31oct2005.pdf
European Commission (2013), Commission Staff Working Document Implementing and Action Plan for Design-Driven Innovation, Brussels
Feyerabend, P. (2010) Against Method, 4th ed., New York, NY: Verso Books, 2010,
Gibson, J. (1977) – ‘The Theory of Affordances’–. In: Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing, Eds. Shaw, R. & Bransford, J. ISBN 0-470-99014-7
Greeno, J. (1998) – ”The situativity of knowing, learning, and research” –, American Psychologist 53 (1): 5–26
Gulari, M., Fairburn S., Malins J. (2013a) Trust Me, I Am An Expert, Why Is There A Lack Of Trust To Design Expertise, 10th European Academy of Design Conference: Crafting the Future, 17-19th April, Gothenburg, Sweden
Gulari, M., Fairburn S., Malins J. (2013b), Assessing the Effectiveness of Design-led Innovation support for SMEs, 10th European Academy of Design Conference: Crafting the Future, 17-19th April, Gothenburg, Sweden
Hauser, H. (2010) The Current and Future Role of Technology and Innovation Centres in the UK, for Lord Mandelson, HM Secretary of State, Department for Business Innovation and Skills
Horn M. et al (2009) Delivering the Innovation Dream: The BDI Report for HM Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (DIUS)
Jolly, A. (2011), Working with Universities, Crimson Publishing Ltd, Surrey, UK
Kelley, T. & Littman J. (2009) The Ten Faces of Innovation, Doubleday, USA
Kolb, D. (1983) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-42374-0
Malins, J. (2013) Transformative Design Thinking: A human-centred model for innovation, 10th European Academy of Design Conference: Crafting the Future, 17-19th April, Gothenburg, Sweden
Malins, J. (2011) Innovation by Design: A Programme to Support SMEs’, In: Swedish Design Research Journal No 2.11, pp25–32, SVID, Stockholm, Sweden.
Michlewski, K. (2008) –‘Uncovering design attitude: Inside the culture of designers.’ – Organization Studies, 29/3: 373–392.
Nieuwenhuis L., Lokman I., Gielen, P. (1999) Learning VET-colleges within learning regions. In: European Conference on Educational Research, Lahti, Finland 22-25 September 1999. Available www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001202.htm
O’Nions, K. (2007) The Sainsbury Review, Foundation for Science and Technology, HM Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills, 14th November 2007
Polanyi, M. (2009) The Tacit Dimension, Doubleday Broadway Group, Chicago
Potter, S. et al (1991) The Benefits and Costs of Investment in Design, The Open University UMIST Report Dig-03 Design Innovation Group, September
Press M. & Cooper R. (2003) The Design Experience: The Role of Design and Designers in the Twenty-First Century, Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, England
Rothwell, R. (1984) The role of small firms in the emergence of new technologies, OMEGA, the international journal of management science, 12, pp. 19–29.
Roy, R., Salaman, G. & Walsh, V. (1986) Research Grant Final Report, Design-Based Innovation in Manufacturing Industry. Principles and Practices for Successful Design and Production, Report Dig-02, Design Innovation Group, Open University, Milton Keynes.
Schrage, M. (2000) Serious Play: How the World’s Best Companies Simulate to Innovate, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
Sinek, S. (2009) Start with Why, Penguin Group, London
Thenint, H. (2008) Design as a tool for innovation – Report. PRO INNO Europe – INNO GRIPS. Retrieved 5 June 2013 from http://grips.proinno-europe.eu/knowledge_base/view/549/designas-a-tool-for-innovation-workshop-report/
Von Stamm, B. (2004) Innovation – What’s design got to do with it? Design Management Review, 15(1), pp.10–19
Walsh, V., Roy, R., Bruce, M. & Potter, S. (1992) Winning by Design, Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA.
Wujek, T. (2010) Build a Tower, Build a Team – The “Marshmallow Problem” Recorded at TED University 2010, February 2010 in Long Beach, CA, Available: www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0_yKBitO8M
